Head-to-head comparison
HeyReach scales LinkedIn sending across unlimited seats, but you still bring your own senders, your own email tool, and your own targeting. nRev runs signal-based targeting, LinkedIn automation, and email sequencing in one system.
Trusted by 200+ B2B revenue teams
TL;DR
HeyReach is built for agencies and teams that need LinkedIn automation at real scale, unlimited senders under flat pricing tiers once you're big enough to justify them. But it has no signal-based targeting of its own, email sequencing is outsourced through an integration with a separate tool like Instantly or Smartlead, and enrichment is limited to verified-email lookup credits. nRev runs signal-based outbound, native LinkedIn automation, and full email sequencing together, with real enrichment included.
Here's how HeyReach and nRev stack up across targeting, execution, and pricing.
| Feature | HeyReach | nRev |
|---|---|---|
| 🔎 Data enrichment | Verified-email lookup credits only | Yes, waterfall across 100+ integrations |
| ✉️ Native outbound sequencing | No, outsourced to a separate tool via integration | Yes, native on every plan |
| 🔗 LinkedIn automation | Yes, built for scale | Yes |
| 📡 Signal-based outbound | No, executes on lists you bring in | Yes |
| 🤝 CRM sync | Via integrations only, no native CRM | Yes |
| 💳 Pricing model | Per-sender pricing, LinkedIn seats not included | Flat monthly rate |
| Price | $79/seat/mo (Growth) | $149/mo flat |
HeyReach handles LinkedIn sending, but needs a separate email tool and separate enrichment source to round out a real outbound motion. nRev runs all three natively.
HeyReach executes sequences on senders and lists you bring in. nRev surfaces accounts worth contacting from funding, hiring, and tech-stack signals first.
HeyReach's enrichment is limited to verified-email credits bundled per tier. nRev runs a full waterfall enrichment process across 100+ integrations.
| Growth | $79/seat/mo |
| Agency | $999/mo (25 senders) |
| Unlimited | $2,999/mo |
| Nudge | $149/mo |
Some teams keep HeyReach for pure LinkedIn sending scale and run nRev for the targeting, enrichment, and email side. Ask us about running the two together.
HeyReach scaled our LinkedIn sends fine. What it couldn't do was tell us who to send to. Once we moved targeting to nRev, the same sends started converting.
Growth Lead, B2B agency (10-40 employees)
Export your HeyReach sender lists and sequence structure
Point nRev's signal detection and enrichment waterfall at your target accounts
Run LinkedIn and email sequencing natively from day one
If you're running LinkedIn sends at real agency scale and already have targeting and email sorted separately, HeyReach still does its one job well. If you want targeting, LinkedIn automation, email sequencing, and enrichment in one system, nRev covers more of the motion natively.
For most GTM teams, yes. nRev runs native LinkedIn automation alongside signal-based targeting, email sequencing, and enrichment. Agencies running LinkedIn sends across dozens of client accounts at HeyReach's Unlimited tier may still want that specific scale tool.
Yes. Most teams export their existing sender lists and sequence logic, point nRev's signal detection and enrichment at the same target accounts, and run LinkedIn and email sequencing from day one.
It depends on scale, but often yes once the separate email tool and enrichment source HeyReach requires are counted. HeyReach's Growth tier runs $79 per seat a month before adding an email tool. nRev's Nudge plan is $149 a month flat and includes email sequencing and enrichment natively.
HeyReach is a strong choice if LinkedIn sending volume at agency scale is your main problem to solve, and its per-sender pricing model reflects that. But it has no signal-based targeting of its own, no native email sequencing, and enrichment limited to lookup credits, meaning it's one piece of a larger stack. nRev runs the targeting, LinkedIn automation, email sequencing, and enrichment together, in one system.
Deploy AI agents that unify GTM data, automate every playbook, and surface next-best actions—so RevOps finally steers strategy instead of firefighting.
